Tuesday, January 17

'Tis my MCs for Depravity.

3 comments
I did a sorta similar post here on Shadowed's characters. But this time, it's all about Depravity. This really helps you get to know your characters ^-^

My Female MC's personality outline:




Global Personality Test Results
Stability (50%) medium which suggests you average somewhere in between being calm and resilient and being anxious and reactive.
Orderliness (60%) moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, reliable, neat, and hard working at the expense of flexibility, efficiency, spontaneity, and fun.
Extraversion (26%) low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and secretive.
Take Free Global Personality Test
Personality Test by SimilarMinds.com


clean, secretive, does not make friends easily, observer, hates large parties, risk averse, perfectionist, reclusive, solitude loving, more practical than abstract, does not like to stand out, high self control, intellectual, mind over heart, very cautious, takes precautions, respects authority, irritable, emotionally sensitive


Aaand my Male [Somewhat] MC o.o 


Global Personality Test Results
Stability (73%) high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic..
Orderliness (46%) medium which suggests you are moderately organized, hard working, and reliable while still remaining flexible, efficient, and fun.
Extraversion (70%) high which suggests you are overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense too often of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.
Take Free Global Personality Test
Personality Test by SimilarMinds.com


social, outgoing, worry free, optimistic, upbeat, tough, likes large parties, makes friends easily, rarely irritated, open, enjoys leadership, trusting, dominant, thrill seeker, strong, does not like to be alone, assertive, mind over heart, confident, controlling, feels desirable, likes the spotlight, loves food, social chameleon, hard working, concerned about others


Polar opposites here. Woah. o.o

- E

Monday, January 16

Hourglass by Myra McEntire

0 comments
Title: Hourglass
Author: Myra McEntire
Genre: Young Adult - Paranormal & Science Fiction
How I Obtained Said Book: from the wonderful public library
Series: Book 1 in a possible two-book series
The Blurb: (from Goodreads)
One hour to rewrite the past . . . 

For seventeen-year-old Emerson Cole, life is about seeing what isn’t there: swooning Southern Belles; soldiers long forgotten; a haunting jazz trio that vanishes in an instant. Plagued by phantoms since her parents’ death, she just wants the apparitions to stop so she can be normal. She’s tried everything, but the visions keep coming back.


So when her well-meaning brother brings in a consultant from a secretive organization called the Hourglass, Emerson’s willing to try one last cure. But meeting Michael Weaver may not only change her future, it may change her past.


Who is this dark, mysterious, sympathetic guy, barely older than Emerson herself, who seems to believe every crazy word she says? Why does an electric charge seem to run through the room whenever he’s around? And why is he so insistent that he needs her help to prevent a death that never should have happened?

Full of atmosphere, mystery, and romance, Hourglass merges the very best of the paranormal and science-fiction genres in a seductive, remarkable young adult debut.


The Review: (Warning: Possibles spoilers below)

Emerson Cole has a serious problem. Ever since her parents were killed in an automobile accident, she's been able to see ghosts--although that might not exactly be the right word for it. They're like memories, sort of, because when Emerson sticks her hand in one of them, they immediately disappear. Before, these "memories" used to be just people from the past, but at the start of the novel, Emerson starts seeing much larger and more complicated "memories": groups of people. Scenes. So when her older brother tells Emerson that he's brought yet another consultant whom he believes will be able to help her with her "issue", Emerson is reluctant at first but eventually accepts this offer. And so, she meets Michael Weaver, who is from a mysterious organization called the Hourglass, who is--you guessed it--gorgeous, amazing, understanding...and seems to know more about Emerson that she does herself.

Yes, Publishing World, I get it. The Main Male Character in any novel MUST BE gorgeous, amazing, and understanding. He just has to be or the books will not sell. And the Main Female Character MUST CONSIDER looks first. It's an absolute must. 

If anything, the one thing I disliked the most about Emerson was her shallow personality. Throughout most of the book, Emerson admits to herself that Michael can be infuriating and messed up and whatever--but, nope, that's all right, he's forgiven, because he's also gorgeous and amazing and understanding. Why does that matter? It shouldn't! The only redeeming parts Emerson had in this case were her proper reactions to Michael's Infuriatingness--and that was getting angry with him whenever he did something confusing and selfish, in Emerson's eyes (and mine) anyway. Later on, it's revealed why Michael behaved in such a weird way, and I would have been okay with Emerson's relationship with him after reading that part if I hadn't remembered that the only reason she felt so drawn to him in the first place was because of how ridiculously gorgeous he was. 'Course, Emerson is an independent young lady (there are too many independent, hot headed, reckless young ladies in YA books these days), and she supposedly doesn't take crap from anyone--except for maybe someone who's hot and sends electric sparks at you (more on that later). 

And then there's Michael himself. He's a great example of a Gary Stu with a tragic past. Everything about him is perfect--he's hot, he's noble, he's loyal, he's compassionate, and he might be rude and horrible at times but he has good intentions so it's all right. But he's not a believable character in my eyes.  I have read this kind of personality again and again and again, and I'm fairly tired of it. Julie Kagawa's Iron Fey Series is an exception, as is Cassandra Clare's Mortal Instruments Series because both Ash and Jace have some pretty obvious flaws whereas Michael has none. Plus, there were parts when his dialogue got a little funky: one minute he'd be talking like he lives in the 21st century, and the next his dialogue would flash to the 19th or 20th centuries (and this isn't a plot pun or anything, guys). He could get very formal very fast. Maybe Ms. McEntire felt the need to show Michael's maturity, but to me, it just turned out inconsistent and slightly weird.

There was another big thing that bothered me: Kaleb. 

Kaleb has a somewhat important secondary role in this book (but it's not as fleshed out because Hourglass's main plot centers around the typical Emerson-Michael-Otherworldly Conflict element), and he seems to be an interesting character because he has flaws. But then he falls in love (possibly) with our main character, Emerson, because she's so independent and blunt. And this happens in the span of a day or so. Which I just don't understand. 

I'm all right with love triangles, love conflicts, love anything between more than two people. But relationships take time to build, and Kaleb's relationship with Emerson is equivalent to Romeo's relationship with Juliet. Which basically means: I don't understand it and I don't believe it. I'm actually rooting for Emerson to choose Michael on this one. They at least had some relationship development. There's also another subtle love triangle between Michael, Emerson, and this girl named Ava who is no doubt the most gorgeous girl you will ever meet. Once again there's a love triangle between Gorgeous Girl, Gorgeous Guy, and our Underdog and Very Jealous MC. And once again Gorgeous Guy just brushes off Gorgeous Girl for MC, even though she isn't gorgeous--which makes me wonder, if the author can make a non-shallow Male Lead, why can't she make a non-shallow Female Lead? There's some kind of "unexpected" twist of character traits here.

Despite all of this though, Hourglass had some pretty redeeming qualities. For example, the premise itself is very interesting. I loved how Ms. McEntire created those Laws that even time traveling had to be built around. I was a little overwhelmed and irritated by the amount of different supernatural abilities (it reminded me a lot of the vampires from the Twilight Saga), but that's okay because the characters the abilities belonged to were memorable (though, of course, I didn't get to read much about them). I also loved the plot twists. Man. Those were the best parts of the book and probably the only reasons I want to read the sequel. The only part that didn't go with me was the whole spark-igniting thing between Emerson and Michael. I really didn't understand that one. Past Time Traveler + Future Time Traveler = igniting physical sparks? Maybe this was explained in the book somewhere, but if it was, I didn't catch on. 

(SPOILERS BELOW. Highlight to read)

And speaking of the whole Past-Future time traveling thing, in the book it's stated that anyone can travel to the future, but not many can travel to the past, making Emerson very special. But hang on a second. Didn't Michael, Future Time Traveler, travel to the past with Emerson using Cat's exotic matter ability? Doesn't that mean both Past and Future time travelers could easily go to the past? (Well, assuming they find another Cat). Maybe someone can clarify this for me.

Also, I liked how Ms. McEntire created a fairly 3-D MC (despite some of the MC's characteristics being a little overused) with an interesting past. I'm a little grateful that she didn't make Michael a dark, brooding type of male lead, but his perfection was still a little too much for me.

In Conclusion...! 

Despite Hourglass falling flat and infuriating me majorly at some points, it's still pretty gripping. I mean, the plot twists were excellent. The characters/relationships, not so much. But I'm still reading the sequel,  Timepiece. 

Rating: 7 - Now this, this is a book. Just a book.
I was actually going for a 6 (Hey you. Unless you have absolutely nothing else to read, I would recommend passing this book on the bookshelf), but the plot twists were seriously good and unexpected, so I felt like they redeemed the issues I had with the book somewhat. 

- E

Why I'm bad with vocabulary -- Writing Prompt (#2)

4 comments
Get a dictionary and choose 10 5 words from it without looking at the definitions. Write them down and create definitions for them. What do the words make you think of? What do you think they should mean?


Ah.










Oh, this brings back memories of SAT studying. The Critical Reading section of the SATs is supposed to be the most difficult section for a reason. Vocabulary is some difficult stuff (<--see? I used "difficult" twice. That's some serious vocabulary list I have in my head) Especially for me. Which might sound weird coming from an aspiring writer, but let's just forget about that for now.

If you do happen to know what these words mean beforehand...well. Don't laugh. I mean it -.-

- VESPERTINE: Did you know that Google Chrome says that this isn't even a word? It has a red squiggly line underneath it right now. Hrm. Interesting.
Anyway. I'm going to break this down: vesper + tine = vespertine. So what's a vesper? No clue. For some reason it reminds me of a snake (probably because it's sort of similar to the word "viper"), so I'm going to say that it's someone with...snake-like attributes. Or um...something slithery? Slimey? I'm just assuming this is a noun >.>
- MUGWUMP: Wait a second. Google Chrome says "vespertine" isn't a word, but when it comes to a word like "mugwump", it says it is one? Ridiculous, I'm telling you >.<
So mugwump. Probably an adjective. Definitely not having anything to do with mugs (just assuming that right now). Um...let's see. I'd be lying if I said that the first image that popped in my head when I saw this word wasn't an image of a mug, but that has nothing to do with the definition, I'm sure of it. It's probably an insult. Probably an offensive word someone would use. Like, "Hey, you're such a mugwump." Oh wait. That would make it a noun then o.o
- INCURSION: Curses? Cutting? Wait, no, that's incision. I think. Agh. I really don't know this one, I don't. All I can think of is incision right now.
- PURBLIND: All right, this one looks like pure-blind. Like "pure blood" but instead of blood, it's blind. So then...someone who's completely blind? No, that's too direct. Um. The definition of this word doesn't reflect anything good. There.
- VICISSITUDE: A pretty weird word to pronounce. Its pronunciation is equivalent to that of the name "Narcissus". Lots of "sss". Like a snake. Rhymes with "attitude". All I can think of is someone with some kind of harsh, offensive personality. But I really have no clue.

Well there you go. Some literary embarrassment right there, I guess. At least I can spell (what? what is this spell check you speak of?)

Reviewing Hourglass later today! And Happy MLK Day ^-^

- E

THE ACTUAL DEFINITIONS


- VESPERTINE: of, pertaining to, or occurring in the evening (way off with this one)
- MUGWUMP: a person who is unable to make up his or her own mind on an issue (bah. so it is a noun)
- INCURSION: an invasion of a place or territory (eh. cutting into a territory, maybe?)
- PURBLIND: nearly or partially blind (close enough)
- VICISSITUDE: a change or variation occurring in the course of something (right, I completely failed this one.)

Sunday, January 15

I'm killing trees/The Giant Outline of Dread.

4 comments
Confession time!

What does a writer/potential author do best?

Kill trees.

No matter what kind of writer you are, whether or not you write brilliant stories or crappy stories, you will have to kill trees. Well, indirectly. Words go on paper, paper comes from trees. End of flowchart.

I try to avoid printing as much as possible. Since two weeks ago, I'd done all my editing on the computer, but it had been very slow. I felt restricted, like I couldn't see the Bigger Picture. Then two weeks ago, I started printing out my manuscript at school, 10 pages each time I managed to get a computer. So far I've printed about 100 pages, and...you know. 100 pages. That's...a lot. Way more than enough to make me feel guilty.

*sigh* 100 pages. 200 more to go. *winces*

The reason for killing trees, however (at least for me) is to get ready to make the Giant Outline of Dread, or GOoD for short. GOoD will either drive me crazy or make my life considerably easier--or maybe even both. Or neither.

The point of GOoD is for organization purposes. So far I've been working on my WAP (Wikia Article Profiles--they're ideas/word building of my story based on the articles and format of Wikipedia), which also helps with the whole brainstorming ideas part of the organizing. But what I really need is GOoD:

story arcs > chapters > major events = post it notes
post it notes + more post it notes = GOoD

(^if that made any sense at all)

I hate to get all technical, but that up there is GOoD. It's time to stop spending hours trying to remember tiny details in my manuscript and start getting organized.

*sigh*

- E

Friday, January 13

Book Review Policy (ehhhh.)

6 comments
I think I have everything covered on the FTC policy for book reviews. If not, let me know (pretty pretty please).

All right. Here goes nothing.

- Whenever I review books, it is done without any payment or compensation, and it is based solely on my own individual opinions. If I buy a book, borrow a book, or receive a book from a contest or an author/publisher/anyone else, or through any other process, the process through which I obtained the book will be specified in the review. Again, the review itself is all based on what I think.


Soooo...That's it.








--------------------

Originally, I started this blog with the intentions of not reviewing books because I still do not like making authors feel bad. But then I changed my mind for several reasons:

1. There are some pretty good books out there. I mean, many people love books, right? And there are a lot of blogs out there that review books. There are blogs only for reviewing books, blogs that hold book-related contests, blogs that hold character competitions, etc. Unfortunately (or fortunately; it really depends on how you look at it), this blog isn't one of those blogs. Well I mean, starting now, I might post a few reviews here and there, but I'm not going to dedicate everything I have to book reviews. The point is, good books = compulsion-for-people-to-know-about-said-books. Which also brings us to reason two:

2. There are some pretty bad books out there. As well. And I mean awful books. Horrible, whiny books that make you want to throw it at a wall, or burn it, or do other violent things to it. Haven't you always wanted to rant about the crapiness of a book? I know I have. And frankly, sometimes the urge to complain overrules the guilt of insulting a piece of work someone poured their heart and soul into.

3. Book reviews are inspiring. Because they're all opinion, and they can even make authors or would-be writers question their own WIP(s). I know they have for me. (This is going to sound messed up and sadistic-ish, but I love reading the 1-star reviews of bestsellers on Amazon or Goodreads, especially of books I loved. So interesting.) (I'm not sure how this really pertains to me wanting to start reviewing books, unless I somehow manage to be inspiring.)

4. There's this one book called Hourglass by Myra McEntire. And other books similar to its genre/themes. That I really. Really. Want to write. About. Maybe this goes along with reason #1/2.

So guys, that's all there is to it. Four reasons on why I'd like to review books.

Oh, here's the review list thing in case you're wondering:

- Cover (o' course)
- Title, author, genre
- The very important "How I Obtained Said Book" part
- Series: Yes/no (if it's a series, the name of the series will be stated. hopefully.)
- The Blurb
- THE REVIEW (*cue epic music*):
  • First, overall plot summary
  • Then a bit on characters
  • And a bit on the plot
  • And a bit on the key elements/themes/creative ideas/premise/whatever else that was/was supposed to have a long-lasting effect on the reader
  • "In conclusion...!" part
- Rating--and what it means (this will go off a 10-point scale)
  • 1: No. Bad. Never again. Shrivel-up-and-die-worthy of a book. A-b-o-m-i-n-a-t-i-o-n. Grr.
  • 2: The appeal of this book was equivalent to the appeal of kissing a(n) (fill in blank here with horrific creature), though after being paid $20 (<-- why, you could buy another book with that money. ahem.)
  • 3: This was flat out awful. Save a few parts, I suppose. But very few.
  • 4: So much potential, eh? Too bad it failed to reach it.
  • 5: I could care less.
  • 6: Hey, you. Unless you just have absolutely nothing else to read, I would recommend passing this book on the bookshelf.
  • 7: Now this, this is a book. Just a book.
  • 8: Hey there. I think I'll read you again another time.
  • 9: I love you.
  • 10: The light of my life. Currently.
I'll be reviewing Hourglass next week. Heh.

- E

Wednesday, January 11

The Creative Writing Prompt Introduction / The Greasy Paper Plate (#1)

2 comments
In order to motivate myself to do my Spanish homework, I decided to get my brain going by using this nifty web site: Creative Writing Prompts for brain juice...flowingness. I dunno if that made any sense (or if Spanish homework even needs brain juice creativity, but let's just forget about that part) but...I found that site a long time ago, though I just never had the motivation to do much with it. I guess that's changed now. Who knows?

These things will be weekly! I know, I know. I barely even post monthly, so how could I possibly post weekly?

Ah, but one of my new year resolutions is to be a better blogger. So...there you go.

Anyway, here's this weeks.

Close your eyes briefly and think of one object in the room. Focus on it and try to recall as much detail as you can about it. After 3 minutes or so, open your eyes and write about that object without looking at it.


The Greasy Paper Plate

You are on the table, next to my netbook, taunting me like--like those pigs in Angry Birds (after I lose). You, with your grease spots and stains, compelling me to grab another blueberry muffin. Because once upon a time--well, five minutes ago--you once had a muffin upon you, but now that muffin is gone, consumed. By me.

You are white, but not completely clean; round, and not completely smooth. You were once a plate for pizza, a plate my dad picked up from Sam's Club. But you were left alone, by yourself, while the other plates were gradually thrown away one by one. But you, you were left alone until the moment my older sister put a blueberry muffin on you and carried it to me. You were the last paper plate. And now, you too are gone.

My sister asks me if I'm done with you, and almost without a second thought, I say, "Yes, yes I am", still with my eyes closed. I hear her move to the kitchen and the rustle of the plastic bag of the trashcan as you are dumped inside. I should feel guilty, parting with you, but I don't. I don't. All I can think about was how lovely that blueberry muffin looked on you.

I'm not sure why, but I really couldn't take this prompt seriously. Maybe it's because if I had, then it would've sounded REALLY boring. And dull. Possibly. Hm. Maybe you found what I just wrote dull as well. And silly. And ridiculous. 

Until next week then? :D

- E

Monday, January 9

Soul Screamers Reading Challenge !

0 comments
Soul Screamers Reading Challenge

So guys, I just entered myself into the Soul Screamers Reading Challenge for Rachel Vincent's Soul Screamers series. Basically all I have to do is read (well, in this case, reread) the Soul Screamers series and write a review for each book that I reread. Participating in this challenge will put in you in the drawing for many fabulous prizes. You can find more information on this here.

Typically, participants would post their reviews on their blogs, but I'm not going to because of that review policy for blogs that still befuddles me (so if anyone by chance understands that policy--and I'm sure many of you do since you're not like me--feel free to comment and explain it to me. I wouldn't mind reviewing books on here every now and then). I'm posting it on my Goodreads Account instead. Hurray!

Basically, if you want to know what I think of each book of the series, go to my Goodreads account some time and check out my reviews. [As you can see from the banner above] I have five months to reread the series, which is a fairly long time for just five books (a book a month, apparently). I'll hopefully be posting a review on every 15th of each month. So I guess that means by review for My Soul to Take will be up on January 15th (Goodreads account, everyone :P)

And just in case you're interested in participating as well, here's the link again: clicketh me

That's it for now guys! I'm running on limited time, so I'm cutting this post short *shoots pre-calc homework dirty look*

- E